很多同學可能對雅思小作文不太重視，甚至是對小作文根本不加練習，只關(guān)注大作文。
這是一個誤區(qū)，因為在評分中小作文畢竟有一定的比重，而且，小作文的寫法掌握起來也并不是特別難，所以還是應該把小作文的分數(shù)把握好。
一起來看看英國人怎么寫小作文的呢?
題目解析
Some people think the best way to solve traffic congestions in cities is to provide free public transport 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
思路解析
一些人認為在城市中解決交通擁堵的最好方法是提供每天 24 小時,每周 7 天的免費公交,你是否同意?
本題屬于社會類的正反討論題,需要考生討論提供全天免費公交這一措施給 社會帶來的優(yōu)點與缺點。
本題需要注意的是優(yōu)點分析時需要圍繞解決交通擁堵問題展開討論,而非單純對于免費公交本身的好處進行分析。
觀點 1:優(yōu)點分析
1. 免費公交能夠使很多人選擇綠色出行方式,因為大多數(shù)人都會考慮出行成本
2. 免費公交會使一些人放棄購買私家車的計劃,減少機動車擁有率
觀點 2:缺點分析
1. 政府需要大量撥款去支持該項目,造成政府和納稅人的負擔
2. 乘客人數(shù)暴漲,現(xiàn)有交通設施無法承受,容易引發(fā)事故
3. 促使很多本不必要的外出,浪費能源和交通資源
相關(guān)詞匯
- traffic block 交通擁堵
- relieve 減輕
- fossil fuel 化石能源
- private car 私家車
- ownership 擁有率
- utilization rate 使用率
- passenger flow 客流
- traffic paralysis 交通癱瘓
- financial burden 財政負擔
- all-rounded 全面的
- by-effects 副作用
- car-purchasing tax 購車稅
- congestion fee 擁堵費
- travelling cost 出行成本
參考范文
Traffic congestion has become one of the most perturbing issues of modern society. A number of measures are being enacted to address such problem, someone claims that a whole day (24 hours) free public transportation system is a decent idea, while this is not the case.
There is no denying that this method, to a certain extent, could relieve the serious traffic pressure. Due to the soaring price of fossil fuel,the appearance of the free public transportation would enable most people to no longer prefer to drive their private cars considering the travelling cost.Additionally,if the urban public transportation system is convenient enough,the number of people who would like to purchase a private automobile will decrease significantly.Hence,this policy could effectively control the ownership and the utilization rate of automobile thereby alleviating the traffic block.
However, the image will be extremely different if people switch their perspective since this measure would bring a series of negative influence.The decreasing utilization rate of private cars means the increasing pressure of public transportation simultaneously. In the context of such situation,it is hard for the current facilities to bear the soaring passenger flow,it may cause not only the paralysis of the whole system, but also growing numbers of traffic accidents.
Moreover,to maintain the operation of public transportation system,government has to provide those related companies with more subsidies.For short-term development, it will bring government heavier financial burden,and what is worse, in the long run,the development of various other social areas including education, social welfare and technological research will be negatively affected since the funding allocated to these sectors will be cut,which will inevitably prevent the all-rounded social advancement.
In summary, even though this suggestion could enhance the traffic circumstances, while, considering its by-effects above, several other schemes might be regarded as better options comprising levying higher car-purchasing tax or congestion fee during rush hours
